Agrimark Inc
Industrial reporting in West Springfield, MA. 2 reported chemical categories. Food. Reporting does not establish exposure at the searched location.
See what else is within a mile ↗ Original record ↗ Address Brief for an address near here · $40
Record
- Status in source
- Reported for 2024
- Record date
- Reporting year 2024
- Address
- 958 RIVERDALE RD, West Springfield
- Source
- EPA Toxics Release Inventory
- Coordinates
- 42.13020, -72.62640
Facility self-reported chemical releases with units preserved. Reporting does not itself mean violation or exposure; pounds are not concentrations. Distance from a home does not establish exposure.
Within one mile of this record
- 1 hazardous-waste facilities
- 3 cleanup sites
- 4 transmission lines
- 1 communications
- 10 mapped cameras
- 54 major roads
Counts are records within a mile of the point, from the same sources; they overlap and are not unique facilities.
Reported chemical releases (TRI)
Facility self-report to EPA's Toxics Release Inventory. Pounds are not concentrations at any address, and chemicals differ widely in toxicity; do not add them together.
2024 air releases: 0 lb, compared with 0 lb in 2023. Water: 0 lb. Carcinogen-flagged air releases: 0 lb.
| Chemical | Year | Fugitive air | Stack air | Water | Unit | OSHA carcinogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitric acid | 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pounds | No |
| Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pounds | No |
| Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pounds | No |
| Nitric acid | 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pounds | No |
EPA air-program record
Linked by EPA TRI facility ID. A violation can be procedural (monitoring, reporting, permit conditions) or an emissions exceedance; the detailed facility report says which.
- Quarters with a violation in the last three years: 2
- Last violation: 2026-05-14 · pollutants named: TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER
- Last evaluation: 2025-04-03
- Last stack test: none recorded
- Enforcement: 0 formal, 1 informal actions · last formal 2002-11-04
Why this may matter, and what to check
A source is not an exposure measurement. Health effects depend on the chemical or physical agent, whether it reaches a person, its concentration, exposure route, duration and individual susceptibility.
Why this may matter
The chemical, release route and concentration matter more than a facility count or a total number of pounds. Air releases may contribute to exposure downwind; water releases need a water-pathway assessment. Reporting does not itself establish a violation.
How it could reach a home
Air, water and land releases have different transport pathways. Emission mass is not the concentration at an address. Do not add quantities with different units or treat all chemicals as equally toxic.
What remains unknown
- Pollutant concentrations at the address
- Facility-specific exposure contribution
- Whether a compliance issue involved emissions, monitoring or paperwork
What to check next
- Environmental regulator — Review chemical-specific emissions, inspections and the underlying documents for any violation.
- Facility operator — Ask which emissions controls and monitoring apply to the relevant process.
- Environmental professional — Look for a published dispersion or exposure assessment before interpreting personal risk.
Guidance reviewed 2026-09-13 · EPA RSEI screening ↗ · EPA ECHO compliance ↗ · ATSDR exposure pathways ↗
Something wrong with this record? Send a correction; it is checked against the original source before anything changes. Full guide: Industrial releases & air-program facilities.